AWS Scenario based Interview Questions

By /

Okay, here are 20 AWS scenario-based interview questions, each with a detailed technical explanation of the expected answer and the skill/concept being tested.

AWS Scenario-Based Interview Questions:

Question 1:

Scenario: Your company is migrating a monolithic application to AWS. The application has a relational database with sensitive customer data. You need to ensure high availability and durability for this database while minimizing administrative overhead. What AWS service would you recommend, and how would you configure it for this purpose?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would recommend Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) Multi-AZ deployment.

  • High Availability: Multi-AZ creates a synchronous standby replica of your database in a different Availability Zone. In case of an infrastructure failure (e.g., instance failure, AZ outage), RDS automatically fails over to the standby replica, minimizing downtime.
  • Durability: RDS automatically backs up your database and allows point-in-time recovery. These backups are stored in Amazon S3, providing high durability. Enabling backups is crucial.
  • Minimizing Administrative Overhead: RDS manages the underlying infrastructure, patching, and backups, reducing the operational burden compared to managing a database on EC2.

Configuration steps would include:

  • Selecting the appropriate RDS engine (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL).
  • Choosing a suitable instance type based on performance requirements.
  • Enabling the “Create a standby instance” option during database creation or modification to configure Multi-AZ.
  • Configuring backup retention period according to business requirements.
  • Optionally, enabling encryption at rest using AWS KMS for enhanced security of sensitive data.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Relational Database Services (RDS), High Availability, Disaster Recovery, Durability, Cost Optimization, Security (Encryption).

Prompt Enhancement: Generate a diagram illustrating an AWS Region with two Availability Zones. In the first AZ, show a primary Amazon RDS instance. In the second AZ, depict a synchronous standby Amazon RDS instance. Arrows should indicate synchronous replication between the two instances. A separate arrow should point from the primary instance to an S3 bucket, representing automated backups. Label all components clearly.

Question 2:

Scenario: You have a web application running on several EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). Users are reporting intermittent slow response times. How would you diagnose the root cause of this issue?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

To diagnose intermittent slow response times, I would follow these steps:

  • ALB Metrics: Start by examining the ALB metrics in Amazon CloudWatch. Key metrics to analyze include HTTPCode_ELB_5XX_Count (to check for backend errors), TargetResponseTime (to see the latency between the ALB and the instances), HealthyHostCount, and UnHealthyHostCount (to identify any unhealthy instances).
  • EC2 Instance Metrics: Investigate the CloudWatch metrics for the backend EC2 instances. Focus on CPU utilization, memory utilization, network traffic (in/out), and disk I/O. High CPU or memory could indicate resource contention. High network traffic or disk I/O could point to bottlenecks in those areas.
  • Application Logs: Examine the application logs on the EC2 instances. Look for slow database queries, long-running tasks, or any error messages that correlate with the periods of slow response times.
  • Tracing: Implement distributed tracing using AWS X-Ray to understand the path of requests through the application and identify specific services or components contributing to the latency. This helps pinpoint bottlenecks within the application code or its dependencies.
  • Load Testing: Consider performing load testing with tools like Apache JMeter or AWS Load Testing to simulate user traffic and observe how the system behaves under stress. This can help reproduce the intermittent issues and provide more data for analysis.
  • ALB Access Logs: Analyze the ALB access logs to get detailed information about each request, including latency, request path, and client IP. This can help identify patterns or specific requests that are slow.
  • Network Connectivity: Verify network connectivity between the ALB and the EC2 instances and between the EC2 instances and any other dependencies (e.g., databases, APIs). Check security group rules and Network ACLs.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Load Balancing (ALB), Monitoring (CloudWatch), Logging, Distributed Tracing (X-Ray), Performance Analysis, Network Troubleshooting.

Prompt Enhancement: Create a visual representation of a web application architecture. Show multiple EC2 instances in a private subnet behind an Application Load Balancer in public subnets. Illustrate user requests flowing through the ALB to the EC2 instances. Include icons representing Amazon CloudWatch collecting metrics and AWS X-Ray tracing requests. Depict log files being generated on the EC2 instances.

Question 3:

Scenario: Your development team needs a fully managed CI/CD pipeline for a containerized application. The pipeline should build Docker images, push them to a container registry, and deploy them to an Amazon ECS cluster. What AWS services would you recommend for this pipeline, and how would you configure the basic workflow?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would recommend the following AWS services for a fully managed CI/CD pipeline for a containerized application:

  • AWS CodeCommit: For source code version control.
  • AWS CodeBuild: To build the Docker image from the source code and push it to a container registry.
  • Amazon ECR (Elastic Container Registry): To store the Docker images.
  • AWS CodeDeploy (or AWS CodePipeline with ECS deployment action): To deploy the new container image to the Amazon ECS cluster.

Basic workflow configuration:

  1. CodeCommit: Developers commit their code changes to the CodeCommit repository.
  2. CodePipeline: Create a pipeline with the following stages:
    • Source Stage: Connect to the CodeCommit repository and trigger the pipeline on code changes.
    • Build Stage (using CodeBuild):
      • Define a buildspec.yml file in the repository that specifies the build steps.
      • CodeBuild pulls the source code.
      • It builds the Docker image using the Dockerfile.
      • It authenticates with ECR.
      • It tags and pushes the Docker image to the specified ECR repository.
    • Deploy Stage (using CodeDeploy or CodePipeline ECS action):
      • CodeDeploy: Requires configuring an ECS deployment group that references the ECS service and task definition. CodeDeploy updates the ECS service with the new image digest from ECR.
      • CodePipeline ECS Deploy Action: Directly updates the ECS task definition with the new image URI from ECR and triggers an ECS service update.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: CI/CD Pipelines, Containerization (Docker), Container Registries (ECR), Container Orchestration (ECS), Source Control (CodeCommit), Build Services (CodeBuild), Deployment Services (CodeDeploy/CodePipeline).

Prompt Enhancement: Visualize a CI/CD pipeline. Start with an AWS CodeCommit repository. An arrow leads to AWS CodeBuild, where a Docker icon represents image building. Another arrow points to Amazon ECR, showing a Docker image being stored. Finally, an arrow goes to an Amazon ECS cluster with running containers. Label each service clearly and indicate the flow of code and images.

Question 4:

Scenario: You need to store and retrieve a large number of unstructured files (images, videos, documents) with high durability and scalability, and provide public read access to some of these files. What AWS service would you use, and how would you configure it for public access?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would use Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3).

  • Storage: S3 provides object storage with virtually unlimited scalability and high durability (99.999999999% – eleven 9s of durability).
  • Public Access: Public read access can be granted through several methods:
    • Bucket Policies: You can write an S3 bucket policy that grants s3:GetObject permission to anonymous users (*) for specific prefixes or the entire bucket. This is a common and recommended approach for providing public read access to a large number of objects.
    • Object ACLs (Access Control Lists): Individual objects can have ACLs that grant public read permission. However, for a large number of objects, managing ACLs can be cumbersome. Bucket policies are generally preferred for scalability.
    • Pre-Signed URLs: For temporary public access to specific objects, you can generate pre-signed URLs that grant access for a limited time and with specific permissions. This is suitable for controlled sharing rather than general public access.

Configuration for public access using a bucket policy would involve:

  1. Creating an S3 bucket.
  2. Writing a bucket policy (in JSON format) that includes a Statement with:
    • Effect: "Allow"
    • Principal: "*" (wildcard for all users)
    • Action: "s3:GetObject"
    • Resource: Specify the S3 object key(s) or prefix(es) that should be publicly accessible (e.g., "arn:aws:s3:::your-bucket-name/public/*" for all objects within a “public” folder).
  3. Attaching this bucket policy to the S3 bucket.
  4. Ensuring that Block Public Access settings at the bucket and account levels are configured to allow the desired level of public access.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Object Storage (S3), Scalability, Durability, Access Control (Bucket Policies, ACLs), Security.

Prompt Enhancement: Illustrate an Amazon S3 bucket containing various unstructured files (images, videos, documents). Show a user outside the AWS cloud accessing these files via a public internet connection. Depict a bucket policy icon attached to the S3 bucket, indicating public read permissions.

Question 5:

Scenario: Your application needs to process messages asynchronously. The volume of messages can vary significantly, with occasional large spikes. You need a messaging service that is highly scalable, reliable, and integrates well with other AWS services. What service would you recommend and how would you ensure messages are processed by multiple consumers?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would recommend Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS).

  • Scalability and Reliability: SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that automatically scales to handle any volume of messages. It provides at-least-once delivery and high availability across multiple Availability Zones.
  • Integration: SQS integrates seamlessly with various AWS services like EC2, Lambda, and ECS.

To ensure messages are processed by multiple consumers, I would use the following approach:

  • Multiple Consumers: Launch multiple instances (EC2, Lambda functions, or container instances in ECS) that are configured to consume messages from the same SQS queue.
  • Polling: Consumers can periodically poll the SQS queue for new messages using the ReceiveMessage API action.
  • Long Polling: To reduce costs and latency associated with frequent polling, configure long polling. With long polling, the ReceiveMessage request waits for a message to arrive in the queue (up to a specified timeout period) before returning a response.
  • Message Visibility Timeout: When a consumer receives a message, it becomes “invisible” to other consumers for a configured visibility timeout period. This prevents multiple consumers from processing the same message simultaneously. The consumer should delete the message using the DeleteMessage API action after successful processing. If processing fails within the visibility timeout, the message becomes visible again and can be processed by another consumer.
  • Auto Scaling: For EC2 or ECS consumers, configure Auto Scaling based on metrics like the approximate number of messages visible in the SQS queue. This allows the number of consumers to automatically scale up or down based on the message volume.
  • Dead-Letter Queues (DLQs): Configure a DLQ to which messages that fail to be processed after a certain number of retries are moved. This helps in identifying and debugging processing issues without losing messages.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Message Queuing (SQS), Asynchronous Processing, Scalability, Reliability, Consumer Management, Error Handling (DLQ).

Prompt Enhancement: Visualize an Amazon SQS queue with several messages in it. Show multiple consumer instances (e.g., EC2 boxes or Lambda icons) concurrently pulling messages from the queue. Include a Dead-Letter Queue (DLQ) where messages that fail processing are moved. Illustrate the concept of message visibility timeout.

Question 6:

Scenario: You have a web application that needs to store user session data. The data needs to be highly available, provide low-latency reads and writes, and be able to scale automatically with the number of users. What AWS service would you recommend for this purpose?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would recommend Amazon ElastiCache. Specifically, either:

  • Amazon ElastiCache for Redis: Redis is an in-memory data store that provides extremely low latency and high throughput, making it ideal for caching frequently accessed data like user sessions. It supports features like data persistence, replication for high availability, and automatic scaling.
  • Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached: Memcached is another in-memory caching system known for its simplicity and high performance. While it doesn’t offer the same level of advanced features as Redis (like persistence), it can be a cost-effective option for simple session caching where data loss in case of a failure is acceptable.

For high availability and automatic scaling with Redis:

  • Redis Cluster: Use ElastiCache for Redis configured in cluster mode. This partitions the data across multiple nodes, allowing for horizontal scaling and increased throughput. It also provides automatic failover by having replica nodes for each shard.
  • Auto Scaling: Configure automatic scaling policies based on metrics like CPU utilization or memory usage to dynamically adjust the number of nodes in the Redis cluster based on the load.
  • Multi-AZ: Deploy the Redis cluster across multiple Availability Zones to ensure availability even in the event of an AZ outage.

For Memcached:

  • Auto Discovery: Use auto-discovery to allow your application instances to automatically detect and connect to the available Memcached nodes as the cluster scales.
  • Elasticity: ElastiCache for Memcached allows you to easily add or remove nodes to handle changing load.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: In-Memory Caching (ElastiCache – Redis/Memcached), Session Management, High Availability, Low Latency, Scalability, Auto Scaling.

Prompt Enhancement: Create a diagram showing a web application tier (multiple EC2 instances behind an ALB) interacting with an Amazon ElastiCache for Redis cluster. Illustrate data being read from and written to the Redis cluster for user sessions. Depict the Redis cluster spanning multiple Availability Zones and including primary and replica nodes.

Question 7:

Scenario: Your company has a global user base, and you need to distribute static web content (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images) with low latency to users worldwide. What AWS service would you use, and how would you configure it to achieve this?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would use Amazon CloudFront, a global content delivery network (CDN) service.

Configuration steps:

  1. Origin: Configure an origin for CloudFront, which is the source of your static content. This can be:
    • S3 Bucket: The most common origin for static web content.
    • EC2 Instance(s) or Load Balancer: If your content is dynamically generated or served by a web server.
    • Custom Origin: Any HTTP or HTTPS endpoint.
  2. Distribution: Create a CloudFront distribution. When creating the distribution:
    • Specify the origin(s).
    • Configure cache behaviors, which define how CloudFront should cache content based on URL patterns. You can set TTLs (Time-to-Live) for cached objects.
    • Configure viewer protocol policy (HTTP to HTTPS redirection is recommended for security).
    • Specify supported HTTP methods.
    • (Optional) Configure WAF (Web Application Firewall) for added security.
    • (Optional) Associate a custom domain name (e.g., static.yourdomain.com) with the distribution using AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) for SSL/TLS certificates.
  3. DNS: Update your DNS records to point your static content domain (if using a custom domain) to the CloudFront distribution’s domain name.

How it achieves low latency globally:

  • Edge Locations: CloudFront uses a global network of edge locations. When a user requests your content, the request is routed to the nearest edge location.
  • Caching: If the content is cached at that edge location (based on the configured cache behavior), it is served directly to the user with low latency.
  • Origin Fetch: If the content is not cached at the edge location, CloudFront fetches it from the configured origin. Subsequent requests for the same content from nearby users will then be served from the edge cache.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Content Delivery Network (CloudFront), Global Content Distribution, Caching, DNS, SSL/TLS, Origin Configuration.

Prompt Enhancement: Depict a world map with AWS CloudFront edge locations distributed across different continents. Show a user in one part of the world making a request that is routed to the nearest edge location. An arrow should indicate the edge location fetching content from an S3 bucket (the origin) and then delivering it to the user.

Question 8:

Scenario: You need to grant a third-party vendor temporary access to a specific S3 bucket to upload files. How would you securely provide this access without sharing your AWS account credentials?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would use AWS Security Token Service (STS) to generate temporary security credentials (an access key ID, a secret access key, and a security token) with limited permissions for the vendor. Specifically, I would:

  1. Create an IAM Role: Create an IAM role in your AWS account with permissions to perform only the necessary actions on the specific S3 bucket (e.g., s3:PutObject for uploading files). Define the Resource in the role’s policy to be the ARN of the specific S3 bucket or a specific prefix within it.
  2. AssumeRole with External ID: Configure the trust policy of the IAM role to allow the third-party vendor’s AWS account to assume the role. For enhanced security, use an ExternalId condition in the trust policy. This requires the vendor to provide the correct ExternalId when assuming the role, preventing unauthorized access even if their account is compromised. Share the Role ARN and the ExternalId with the vendor.
  3. Vendor Assumes the Role: The third-party vendor, using their own AWS credentials, can use the AWS CLI, SDK, or API to call the AssumeRole API operation, providing your Role ARN and the agreed-upon ExternalId. STS will then return temporary security credentials.
  4. Vendor Uses Temporary Credentials: The vendor can use these temporary credentials to interact with the specified S3 bucket within the permissions granted by the IAM role and for the limited duration of the session (typically up to 1 hour).

Alternatively, for simpler scenarios or if the vendor doesn’t have an AWS account, you could consider creating pre-signed URLs for uploading objects to the S3 bucket. However, STS-based temporary credentials offer more flexibility if the vendor needs to perform multiple actions or interact with other AWS services in the future (though that should be carefully controlled through the IAM role’s permissions).

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Identity and Access Management (IAM Roles, Policies, Trust Policies), AWS Security Token Service (STS), Temporary Security Credentials, Secure Access Management, External ID.

Prompt Enhancement: Illustrate two separate AWS accounts. In the first account (your account), show an IAM role with specific S3 upload permissions. An arrow points from the third-party vendor’s AWS account to AWS STS, indicating an “AssumeRole” request with an External ID. Another arrow shows STS issuing temporary credentials back to the vendor. Finally, an arrow indicates the vendor using these temporary credentials to upload files to the specified S3 bucket in your account.

Question 9:

Scenario: Your web application stores sensitive data in an RDS database. You need to encrypt this data at rest to comply with security regulations. How would you achieve this in AWS RDS?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

I would enable encryption at rest for the RDS database using AWS Key Management Service (KMS).

Steps to enable encryption at rest:

  1. Choose an Encryption Key: You can either use the default KMS key managed by AWS for RDS in your account and Region (aws/rds), or you can create your own customer-managed KMS key. Using a customer-managed key provides more control over the key lifecycle and permissions.
  2. Enable Encryption During Database Creation: When creating a new RDS instance, you can select the “Enable Encryption at Rest” option and choose the desired KMS key.
  3. Encrypting Existing Unencrypted Databases: Directly encrypting an existing unencrypted RDS instance is not supported. To encrypt an existing database, you need to:
    • Create a snapshot of the unencrypted database.
    • Copy the snapshot and enable encryption with the desired KMS key during the copy process.
    • Restore a new encrypted RDS instance from the encrypted snapshot copy.
    • (Optional but recommended) Delete the original unencrypted database instance after verifying the new encrypted instance is working correctly.
  4. Data Encryption: Once encryption at rest is enabled, the following data is encrypted:
    • The underlying storage of the DB instance.
    • Automated backups.
    • Read replicas.
    • Snapshots.

Important Considerations:

  • Performance Impact: There might be a slight performance overhead associated with encryption and decryption operations. It’s important to test your application after enabling encryption.
  • KMS Key Management: If you use a customer-managed KMS key, you are responsible for managing its lifecycle, including rotation and access policies.
  • Read Replicas: When creating a read replica of an encrypted RDS instance, the replica will also be encrypted with the same key. To encrypt with a different key in a different account, you would need to perform a cross-account encrypted snapshot copy and restore.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Relational Database Service (RDS), Encryption at Rest, AWS Key Management Service (KMS), Security, Compliance.

Prompt Enhancement: Illustrate an Amazon RDS database instance with a lock icon, signifying encryption. Show an arrow pointing from AWS KMS to the RDS instance, indicating that the encryption key is managed by KMS. Depict the underlying storage, backups, and read replicas also with lock icons to show they are also encrypted.

Question 10:

Scenario: You have a microservices architecture running on Amazon ECS. You need to enable secure communication between these services. How would you achieve mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication within your ECS cluster?

1. Expected Answer (Detailed Technical Explanation):

Achieving mutual TLS (mTLS) within an Amazon ECS cluster involves several approaches, often leveraging service mesh technologies or implementing TLS at the application level with certificate management. A common and recommended approach is using AWS App Mesh.

Using AWS App Mesh:

  1. App Mesh Setup:
    • Control Plane: App Mesh provides a service mesh control plane. You define mesh, virtual nodes (representing your services), virtual routers, and routes within the mesh.
    • Envoy Proxy: App Mesh injects Envoy proxy containers as sidecars into your ECS tasks. These proxies intercept all network traffic to and from the service.
  2. Certificate Management:
    • AWS Private CA: Use AWS Private Certificate Authority (PCA) to issue private TLS certificates for your services.
    • ACM Certificates: You can also use certificates managed by AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), but for mTLS within a private network, PCA offers more control.
  3. mTLS Configuration in App Mesh:
    • TLS Validation Context: Configure a TLS validation context on your virtual nodes, specifying the trust store (CA certificates from PCA or ACM) that the Envoy proxy should use to verify the client certificates presented by other services.
    • Client Policy: Configure a client policy on your virtual nodes to require TLS and optionally specify the subject alternative names (SANs) of the client certificates that are considered valid.
  4. Service Communication: When a service (e.g., Service A) makes a request to another service (e.g., Service B):
    • Service A’s Envoy proxy initiates a TLS handshake with Service B’s Envoy proxy.
    • Service A’s Envoy proxy presents its certificate to Service B’s Envoy proxy.
    • Service B’s Envoy proxy validates Service A’s certificate against the configured trust store and client policy.
    • Service B’s Envoy proxy also presents its certificate to Service A’s Envoy proxy, and Service A’s Envoy proxy performs similar validation.
    • Only if the certificates are mutually authenticated is the application traffic allowed to flow between the service containers.

Alternative Approaches (Without App Mesh):

  • Application-Level TLS with Certificate Management: Each service can be configured to present and verify TLS certificates. This requires managing certificate generation, distribution, and rotation within your ECS tasks, which can be complex. Services like HashiCorp Vault can help manage certificates.

AWS App Mesh simplifies the implementation and management of mTLS in an ECS environment by abstracting away much of the complexity of certificate handling and traffic interception.

2. Skill/Concept Being Tested: Container Orchestration (ECS), Microservices Architecture, Network Security, Mutual TLS (mTLS), Service Mesh (AWS App Mesh), AWS Private CA, AWS Certificate Manager (ACM).

Prompt Enhancement: Visualize an Amazon ECS cluster with two microservices (Service A and Service B) running as containers within tasks. Show Envoy proxy sidecar containers running alongside each service container. Arrows indicate network traffic between the Envoy proxies. Illustrate TLS handshakes and certificate exchange occurring between the proxies. Include an AWS App Mesh control plane and AWS Private CA as key components in enabling mTLS.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top